Loading Marketing Pulse…
You’re reading the Tuesday, September 8 edition. Showing an earlier Marketing Pulse.
Marketing Pulse Sep 8

Today the jumbo assumption is backwards, and nobody is saying so

Bankrate's jumbo 30-year came in six basis points BELOW conforming this morning, the first inversion in three weeks — which hands you a reason to call the one borrower segment that assumes it is always paying a premium.

Tuesday, September 8, 2026 30Y 6.85%15Y 6.22%5/1 ARM 6.53%

Every high-balance borrower you have ever quoted believes the same thing: a bigger loan costs more. Most of the time they are right — Bankrate's jumbo 30-year has priced four to thirteen basis points above the conforming average every single day for the past three weeks. This morning it did not. Jumbo came in at 6.85% while conforming rose seven basis points to 6.91%, and the gap crossed for the first time in the series. Treat it as one session rather than a trend; this is a noisy line and it can flip back tomorrow. But an assumption being wrong TODAY is a marketing event, and the LO who calls with it is the only one in that borrower's inbox with something specific to say.

Be honest about the size of it, because your borrower will do the math. On an $800,000 loan the difference between 6.85% and 6.91% is about $32 a month. That is not a campaign about savings, and pitching it as one will cost you the credibility you are trying to build. It is a campaign about being the person who priced it both ways instead of assuming. The bigger number in the same conversation is the trend: conforming at 6.91% is the top of both the 30-day range (6.67% to 6.91%) and the 90-day range (6.47% to 6.91%). Anyone you quoted in June at 6.47% is looking at roughly $117 more per month on a $400,000 loan today. Rates have moved up, not down, and saying so plainly is worth more this week than any spin — because August PPI lands Thursday morning and August CPI Friday morning, back to back, with the Fed meeting Tuesday and Wednesday of next week and publishing a fresh set of projections. Your borrowers will hear about all three from someone.

The tactical move is a single offer, and it works precisely because it is small: tell every in-flight borrower near or above the conforming limit that you will price the file both ways before Thursday and send them the two numbers side by side, whichever way it lands. Do not promise the jumbo wins — say you will check, then check. An LO who sends a comparison showing the conforming option is still better has just proven they are not selling, which is the whole asset. Pair it with a plain calendar note for everyone else in the pipeline: two inflation reports Thursday and Friday, a Fed decision next Wednesday, and here is your payment at today's number so you can see what a move actually costs you. No urgency language, no prediction. The date does the work.

Do this today

build one list of active files sized near or above your area's conforming limit, run both pricings, and send each borrower the two numbers with a one-line note saying which you would take and why — before Thursday morning, while the inversion is still on the board.

Borrower segments to act on today

Jumbo files in flight, where today the usual price assumption is backwards

Bankrate has jumbo at 6.85% against 6.91% conforming this morning — a six-basis-point inversion after three straight weeks of a four-to-thirteen-basis-point jumbo premium. On $800,000 that is roughly $32 a month, so the value is the re-quote conversation rather than the savings. Price these both ways before Thursday's PPI print, which is the most likely event to close the gap.

active loans · jumbo
Purchase pre-approvals quoted in June, before the summer run

The 90-day low was 6.47% in mid-June and today is 6.91% — about $117 more per month on a $400,000 loan. These borrowers are working from a number that no longer exists, and finding that out from a listing agent instead of from you is the worst version of the conversation.

active loans · 2–4mo since close · purchases

Today’s content angles

Email

The price-it-both-ways offer, sent to the borrower nobody shops

"Hi {client} — quick note on your file. Most people assume a larger loan always prices higher than a standard one, and most of the time that is true. This morning it is not: the larger-loan pricing I am seeing is actually slightly better. On your loan size that is around $32 a month, so I am not going to pretend it is life changing. What I am going to do is run your file both ways today and send you the two numbers side by side, including if the standard option still wins. You will have them before Thursday morning, when the next inflation report comes out. No decision needed until you see both."

Tactics worth stealing

Lead with the assumption you are overturning, not with the rate

Re-engagement copy that opens on a rate gets filed with every other rate email. Copy that opens on a belief the reader already holds — a bigger loan costs more, my credit is too thin, I need twenty percent down — earns the next sentence, because the reader has to find out whether they are wrong. State the belief in the first line, say plainly whether it holds today, and only then give the number. It also keeps you honest: an assumption is either true today or it is not, so this structure cannot be written without checking.

Bankrate national rate survey, September 8, 2026