Loading Marketing Pulse…
You’re reading the Thursday, September 17 edition. Showing an earlier Marketing Pulse.
Marketing Pulse Sep 17

The wait-for-rates script just got a published counterargument

The Committee's projection table puts the federal funds rate at 4.1% at the end of both 2026 and 2027, which hands you something better than a forecast to send.

Thursday, September 17, 2026 30Y 7.09%15Y 6.46%5/1 ARM 6.70%

Yesterday at 2:05 p.m. Eastern every agent, lender and consumer outlet in your market posted the same reaction to the same headline, and by this morning that content is already buried. Do not chase it. The material worth making today is the one almost nobody is making, because it takes ten minutes of reading rather than ten seconds of reacting: the Fed published a projection table alongside the decision, and that table is the single most useful marketing asset you will get this quarter. The median federal funds rate in it is 4.1% for the end of 2026 and 4.1% again for the end of 2027, with the first median below today's rate not appearing until 2028. Yesterday's brief pointed you at the mortgage-insurance list while everyone else was busy with the Fed; today the Fed material itself is finally worth your time, precisely because the noise has cleared. This has a shelf life of weeks, not hours — it will still be true in November, which means one piece of content carries your whole fall calendar.

The rate context is the part your borrowers will check themselves, so lead with it honestly. Bankrate's conventional 30-year printed 7.06% this morning against 7.02% Wednesday, 6.85% a week ago and 6.71% a month ago — the top of a 90-day range that runs 6.47% to 7.06% across 85 observations. On a $400,000 loan the last month has added roughly $94 a month in principal and interest; the run from June's low is about $157. There is no refinance book to market to at this level and pretending otherwise costs you credibility. What there is, in order: the purchase file that went quiet over the summer waiting for relief that the Committee has now projected away, the conventional borrower from 2023 and 2024 whose mortgage insurance can come off without a new loan at all, and the government-loan borrower who has never been shown a conventional side-by-side. All three conversations start with a number, not a prediction.

The format that works here is an explainer, not a reaction post. Three numbers, thirty seconds, one screen: what the rate is today, what the Fed projects for the end of next year, and what the difference is worth per month on a real loan amount in your market. No opinion about whether any of it is good — your borrowers are not asking you to grade the economy, they are asking whether to keep waiting. Record it once, post it to every channel you run, and then paste the same three numbers into the top of your next four email sends. The reason to do it this week rather than next is not urgency, it is search: people are looking this up right now, and the answer they find should be yours.

Do this today

record one thirty-second explainer built on exactly three numbers — today's rate, the Fed's own end-of-2027 projection, and the monthly dollar difference on a typical loan amount in your market — and send it first to every purchase pre-approval that has gone quiet since July.

Borrower segments to act on today

Purchase pre-approvals that went quiet over the summer

These borrowers paused waiting for the Fed to help and now have a published answer. At 7.06% the last month costs them about $94 more per month on a $400K loan, and the Committee median has no decrease through 2027 — a re-engagement call that needs no forecast.

active loans · 2–6mo since close · purchases
Active government files never shown a conventional side-by-side

Bankrate has FHA at 6.69% and VA at 6.71% against 7.06% conventional — a 35 to 37 bps gap before mortgage insurance is added back. Every active FHA and VA file deserves the comparison run rather than assumed.

active loans · fha/va

Today’s content angles

Short-form video

The three-numbers explainer, built from the Fed's own table

Thirty seconds, face to camera: Today a $400,000 loan runs about $2,677 a month in principal and interest — roughly $94 more than a month ago. The Fed published its own outlook this week and it does not show a lower rate next year. So the question is not whether to wait for a better number, it is what payment actually works for you. Send me your price range and I will run three versions of it today.

Tactics worth stealing

Write the explainer, not the reaction

A reaction post competes with every outlet in the first hour and is dead by morning. An explainer that answers the question people are actively searching — what did the Fed actually project, and what does it cost me per month — keeps earning views for weeks and is the format search engines reward for being genuinely useful rather than timely.

Google Search Central — Creating helpful, reliable, people-first content